What Are the Benefits of Using Synthetic Data?
The most compelling reason, from the privacy perspective, to utilise synthetic data is its ability to mirror patterns, high-level aggregates, and correlations of the original dataset without holding any sensitive information. This opens up numerous possibilities.
Synthetic datasets are often used as stand-ins for test datasets, to validate mathematical models and to train machine learning (ML) models.
In addition, synthetic data can reflect “what if” scenarios and situations that don’t exist in the real world. This enables data scientists to simulate outcomes, test hypotheses, and mathematical models, and make strategic decisions. For instance, in the financial industry, synthetic data can model potential crises or trends, enabling us to prepare and make robust plans before they are actually needed.
Some of the best use cases for synthetic data include:
- Testing: By providing large datasets, synthetic data allows thorough assessments, mimicking real-life scenarios without the need to utilise sensitive data.
- Model training: Synthetic data can train AI models without incurring privacy issues and aid in the fine-tuning of models in the development stage.
- Product development: Synthetic data contributes to a controlled environment for developers to work with while they fine-tune their products, enabling them to avoid the pitfalls resulting from inaccurate or incomplete data.
What Are Synthetic Data’s Limitations?
Despite its potential, synthetic data comes with its challenges. It can miss out on some information, such as losing certain correlations.
Typically, for synthetic data, we need to know the questions we’ll be asking in advance for the data to reflect that. If you have additional questions after, the data might not provide the needed answers. Further, if the underlying data changes, you need to create synthetic data again.
Moreover, while synthetic data may reflect high-level aggregates accurately, individual-level information might not always make sense. It is possible that the biases present in original datasets may be reflected in the synthetic data. Therefore, ensuring fairness is a challenge.
Synthetic data does not inherently provide privacy guarantees and care must be taken to ensure proper implementation using methods such as differential privacy. We will talk about this later in the article.
Training AI Models With Synthetic Data
One of the most common use cases of synthetic data is when training AI models.
While AI models, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Bard have traditionally been trained on a vast array of internet-scraped data, as AI companies face challenges in accessing high-quality data and increasing scrutiny over privacy concerns, synthetic data has been used as an alternative.
Sam Altman has commented: “[I'm] pretty confident that soon all data will be synthetic data”. This notion presents a challenge that may have consequences for both individuals and organisations.
When using synthetic data to train AI systems, it might induce errors in learning and draw misleading conclusions because the input didn’t come from real data points. Further, heavy reliance on synthetic data means that no new information is being added, leading to the diminished value of the AI results.
As the models are often trained on their outputs, which may contain inaccuracies or fabrications, there's a risk of producing "regurgitated knowledge," without any new insights.
Studies conducted by Oxford and Cambridge have raised concerns about the potential risks of training AI models using their unprocessed outputs. These outputs may include inaccuracies or false information, which, over time, could lead to a deterioration of the AI technology, potentially resulting in “irreversible effects”.
GANs algorithms generate synthetic data from relatively small samples, which means that the algorithm might not grasp the full scope of information. Though seemingly realistic at an individual level, there could be major data gaps at a group level—potentially leading to "model collapse" if not supplemented with adequate real-world data.
Transparency deficits also pose serious challenges, fostering uncertainties around data quality and validity The dataset can miss out on nuanced information that you are unable to identify. This is something that shouldn’t be overlooked if it has the potential to impact real-life decisions.